Disposable Postoperative Pain Relief System Details
Product Description
Specifications of Disposable Postoperative Pain Relief System
| Model | Length of infusion catheter(mm) | Number of Catheter (pcs) | Capacity of Infusion pump(ml) | Flow rate(ml/h) |
| TJPS040-1-100-2 | 40 | 1 | 100 | 2 |
| TJPS060-1-100-2 | 60 | 1 | 100 | 2 |
| TJPS060-1-250-2 | 60 | 1 | 250 | 2 |
| TJPS060-1-250-5 | 60 | 1 | 250 | 5 |
| TJPS060-2-250-5 | 60 | 2 | 250 | 5 |
| TJPS080-1-100-2 | 80 | 1 | 100 | 2 |
| TJPS080-1-250-2 | 80 | 1 | 250 | 2 |
| TJPS080-1-250-5 | 80 | 1 | 250 | 5 |
| TJPS080-2-250-5 | 80 | 2 | 250 | 5 |
| TJPS100-1-100-2 | 100 | 1 | 100 | 2 |
| TJPS100-1-250-2 | 100 | 1 | 250 | 2 |
| TJPS100-1-250-5 | 100 | 1 | 250 | 5 |
| TJPS100-2-250-5 | 100 | 2 | 250 | 5 |
| TJPS120-1-100-2 | 120 | 1 | 100 | 2 |
| TJPS120-1-250-2 | 120 | 1 | 250 | 2 |
| TJPS120-1-250-5 | 120 | 1 | 250 | 5 |
| TJPS120-2-250-5 | 120 | 2 | 250 | 5 |
| TJPS040-3-250-5 | 40 | 3 | 250 | 5 |
| TJPS060-3-250-5 | 60 | 3 | 250 | 5 |
| TJPS-2-250-5-120x040 | 12040 | 2 | 250 | 5 |
| TJPS-2-250-5-120x060 | 12060 | 2 | 250 | 5 |
| TJPS-2-250-5-100x060 | 10060 | 2 | 250 | 5 |
| TJPS-2-250-5-100x040 | 10040 | 2 | 250 | 5 |
| TJPS-2-220-3.5-120x040 | 12040 | 2 | 220 | 3.5 |
| TJPS-2-220-3.5-120x060 | 12060 | 2 | 220 | 3.5 |
| TJPS-2-220-3.5-060x060 | 6060 | 2 | 220 | 3.5 |
| TJPS-2-220-3.5-080x080 | 8080 | 2 | 220 | 3.5 |
| TJPS-2-220-3.5-100x100 | 100100 | 2 | 220 | 3.5 |
| TJPS-2-220-3.5-120x120 | 120120 | 2 | 220 | 3.5 |
| TJPS-3-250-5-100x100x040 | 10010040 | 3 | 250 | 5 |
| TJPS-3-250-5-100x100x060 | 10010060 | 3 | 250 | 5 |
| TJPS-3-250-5-120x120x060 | 12012060 | 3 | 250 | 5 |
| TJPS-3-250-5-120x120x040 | 12012040 | 3 | 250 | 5 |
Clinical Trial Reference
This product has been randomly tested in 160 cases in Peking University Hospital and the Third Hospital of Peking University. The test results are as follows:
| Statistics table | Control group (intravenous morphine PCA, number of cases and percentage) | Test group (Continuous local analgesia, lidocaine, number and percentage of cases) | Statistics Volume | P Value | Conclusion |
| Pain 24 hrs post-surgical | Use of auxiliary analgesics | 10(12.50) | 14(17.50) | 0.784a | 0.376a | No significant difference |
| Pain level | 0 N(%) | 32(40.00) | 27(33.75) | 0.741b | 0.459b | No significant difference |
| 1 N(%) | 26(32.50) | 28(35.00) |
| 2 N(%) | 21(26.25) | 25(31.25) |
| 3 N(%) | 1(1.25) | 0(0.00) |
| Pain 48 hrs post-surgical | Use of auxiliary analgesics | 10(12.50) | 17(21.25) | 0.784a | 0.376a | No significant difference |
| Pain level | 0 N(%) | 36(45.00) | 36(45.00) | 0.173b | 0.863b | No significant difference |
| 1 N(%) | 42(52.50) | 44(55.00) |
| 2 N(%) | 2(2.50) | 0(0.00) |
| 3 N(%) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) |
| Patient satisfaction with anesthetic infusion device | Satisfied | 76(95.00) | 78(97.50) |
| 0.681* | No significant difference |
| Unsatisfied | 4(5.00) | 2(2.50) |
|
|
|
| Safety analysis | Side effects(urinary retention,nausea and vomiting,etc.) | 7 | 3 | 1.7067 | 0.191 | No significant difference |
Email Us: